« Pink DS tomorrow.. or not? |
| BBC promotes game-making to kids »
He's not playing easy mode, either.
Posted by Alice at 07:47 | Permalink
Jesus christ. That's at least... five feet, maybe six (out of ten)? Most casual DDR players can just about manage 4, I've got my own hardmat and can barely scrape 6 on a good day.
I'm stunned, utterly insane. Almost as cool as the bloke with one leg playing DDR (I kid you not, can dig it up if you missed it).
Pete C |
April 20, 2005 at 09:58
He's playing So Deep on Heavy, which is difficulty level 9 out of 10 (or 11, depending on who you speak to). It's also a relatively old video, perhaps a year old or more.
Nebu Pookins |
April 20, 2005 at 12:22
The video has been taken down. I can provide a mirror if someone wants to send it to me.
Quentin Smith |
April 20, 2005 at 13:30
Coralized mirror is here: http://www.m90.org.nyud.net:8090/gallery/video/Qhrome-SoDeep0-3085.wmv
April 20, 2005 at 15:41
Really that hard? It didn't look THAT insane (apart from the club juggling) but then I'm not quite a big enough DDR fan to be sure. :)
Pete C |
April 20, 2005 at 16:23
Right Pete. Meet you at the Trocadero. I'll bring juggling balls, and a camera. :)
April 21, 2005 at 09:15
Hah, I'd have to learn to juggle first. ;) It's insanely impressive, not arguing that, I just didn't think it was a 9/10 song. I mostly say this because I *was* at the Troc recently and there were a pair of asian kinds DDRing at far, far sillier speeds than that. Just without the juggling clubs. So much less impressive, obviously. :)
April 23, 2005 at 02:07
I think it's given a 9/10 mainly because it's difficult to "read". The tempo is set relatively low for how fast your feet need to move, so on the screen, it just looks like a big blur of arrows. If you add a 2X speed modifier, it'll probably drop down to a 7.
BaG is another song, extremely slow scroll rate (60bpm?), but with 32nd beats. So give it a 5x multiplayer, and it's hardly harder than you stanrdard 4 or 5 footer. Because the arrows are so bunched up though, BaG is either a 9 or a 10 (can't remember off the top of my head).
Generally though, if you're at the point where you can do 9 footers (Captain Jack, Afronova, etc.), So Deep probably won't cause a problem for you at all, so I guess you'd say So Deep is one of the easier 9 footers.
Nebu Pookins |
May 03, 2005 at 00:52
"So Deep" is an odd duck. It's not really that hard once you get the rhythms down -- not that hard for 8 or 9 caliber players, I mean -- but unless you're in much better physical condition than your average video gamer, the sheer endurance required to finish the song can be a killer.
Most 9 and 10 step songs have a buildup, then a jump-freeze that holds for a few seconds to give you time to prepare before it kicks the difficulty up a notch. "So Deep" doesn't have any such break, it jumps right to taxing and stays there for the whole song.
May 11, 2005 at 04:52
im pretty sure so deep is a 9 simply because of the whole density and endurance required. i can do a few other 9's, but im still working on so deep... the steps are not that hard at all when you get them worked out cause it follows the song so well, mostly galloping... but i still cant last all the way through quite yet because of the sheer amount of stamina and endurance it requires. so of course its not gonna seem like a hard 9 for the DDR vet who's in great shape.
June 13, 2005 at 05:19
DAMMMMMMMM dat iz a 9 holy i can only do half of dat song in heavy....
July 26, 2005 at 18:19
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
(You can use HTML tags like <b> <i> and <ul> to style your text.)
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address